This article explains where energy actually goes in a fluid bed dryer, why reducing airflow volume matters more for energy use than adjusting temperature, and where electric heating fits into the push to decarbonize drying processes.
Most of the energy a fluid bed dryer consumes goes into moving and heating a large volume of air, not simply supplying heat to the material. Fan power to push that air through the bed and the energy needed to raise its temperature both scale with air volume, so a unit that requires more airflow to fluidize its material carries a higher energy cost baked into its basic operating mode, independent of how well-insulated or efficient its heater is.
Fan power rises roughly with the cube of airflow, so doubling the airflow through a bed to fluidize a difficult material can push fan power up several times over, while the energy needed to heat that air increases in rough proportion to its volume. The temperature setting, by comparison, is easy to adjust without anywhere near the same energy penalty. This is why the biggest efficiency gains in fluid bed drying usually come from reducing how much air a process needs, not from tuning the temperature it runs at.
Vibration reduces the airflow needed to fluidize a given material, since mechanical energy takes over part of the work that air alone would otherwise have to do. Indirect heating adds to this by supplying heat through a jacket or heating panels rather than through the air itself, which means less hot air needs to be generated and pushed through the bed to reach the same drying result.
Replacing gas-fired heating with electric resistance heating removes on-site fossil fuel combustion entirely, and electric elements can convert more than 95% of the energy they consume into usable heat. Electricity has historically cost more per unit of energy than gas in many regions, which is part of why electrification hasn't been the default choice, but pairing it with a lower air volume requirement reduces the total energy a unit needs to buy in the first place, narrowing that cost gap.
An efficiency claim based on a manufacturer's theoretical air volume or heater rating doesn't guarantee the same result on your actual material, since real airflow requirements depend on how that specific material fluidizes. Confirming energy performance with a test run on the actual material, rather than a generic efficiency figure, is what separates a real energy saving from one that only holds up in ideal conditions.
Energy use in a fluid bed dryer is driven mainly by how much air has to be moved and heated, not by the temperature setting alone. Vibration and indirect heating both cut that air volume requirement, which is also what makes electric heating a more practical option as processes look to decarbonize.
The following article introduces recommended vibrating dryers by industry.



*1 from official Website (https://www.v-dryer.jp/dryingtest.html)
*2 Related to contact with food and dairy products.